Thursday, September 24, 2009

Knowing is not open to interpretation.

What immeasurable toil went into weaving the human thought form, what endless time, what trial and error,
what a countless multitude of hands!

Education is infinitely commonplace….but what could be more ordinary than the three dimensions in space,
the fall of a body, the propagation of light, the growth of a plant?

The simplicity is time and space are an interpretation of observation.

Time, acting on space, and incorporating it within itself, constitutes a single progression in which space represents a momentary section of the flow, which is endowed with depth and coherence by time.

In any attempt to bring coherence to a reconciliation of ideas the first obstacle is language itself and the capacity to listen.

For as long as we move in an atmosphere that is saturated with both scientific
and intellectual discourses constantly reaching out to inform, permeate and mould, the process of reading or listening can never be more than minimal philosophical aspiration or the concern of a minority.

Unless of course it comes to be seen as a valid point of departure, should the past become uninhabitable, and a change of route worth the attempt.

No comments:

Post a Comment